Tuesday, February 20, 2007

The Blogosphere Gone PC

So you all think you're free thinkers and a real challenge to the morass of MSM? You think you really have it in you to create something TRULY different, to change something out there, to make yourself heard? You think you're somehow more daring, more independent, more provoking than your average Joe?

You're think you're something else, don't you?

Think again!

You're not. You're ALL just a bunch of regular people, Blogosphere. And yes, I mean YOU. Yes, you, and you, and you.

(By the way, I was inspired by this post, in case anyone's wondering what got into me today.)

The rise of the blogosphere was supposed to signal the rise of the citizen journalism. Not without a good reason - that's how it started out. A bunch of brave regular people finally got the tools they needed to investigate what needed to be investigated, to bring up the issues, which needed to be brought up, to ask the tough questions.

The blogosphere, however, was supposed to be more than just a free-for-all for pundits. It was supposed to be a community with innumerable niches, where even the shy, lonely outcasts of the "real life" had space and opportunity to make themselves heard. The blogosphere was supposed to be the most democratic of outlets, empowering individuals who would otherwise feel too intimidated to say aloud what they were thinking deep inside.

Bloggers would run their own show. They could curse, they could gossip about their families anonymously, they could criticize regimes and changes, they could discuss and heatedly dispute whatever issues they felt like, without having to play second fiddle to anyone else's interest.

It was a beautiful vision, which, unfortunately was not to be.

Because the blogosphere went PC.

You don't know me, Blogosphere.

I am the silent lurker, who watches the various communities, leaving only occasional, very general comments. I go from clique to clique, observing, listening, noticing patterns.

I see what's happening, and I don't like it one little bit.

Because what started out as a great experiment deteriorated into the virtual version of the very "real life" everyone dreaded and wished to avoid. Although slightly more liberating than the random browsing of your phone book, the blogosphere wound up placing the very same restrictions on your interactions and communications you willingly and voluntarily, and quite inevitably place upon yourselves in "real life". The restraint and anonymity of interacting with strangers. The fear of forming close ties; thus the proliferation of "anonymouses". The fear of saying the wrong thing to the wrong person, of pissing off your boss, girlfriend, parents, and losing your job, your credibility, your reputation. Of being judged.

You huddle and hide in your tight little cliques, gloating about your wonderful new-found freedom. That's right, you've found your ability to choose among cliques, however, despite what you initially claimed, you completely failed in *eliminating* the very idea of clique mentality. In fact, perhaps, unwittingly, you've joined the ranks of the very people you once condemned in the far away, elusive real life.

Freedom of speech? Ha! Please. What a joke. I'm not talking Big Brother here. Who needs government control, when we are ALL our own best self-censors. I'm not talking about a careful choices of style, tone, issues to present, or guests we allow to visit or comment on our blogs. I'm not even talking about comment moderation. I'm talking about the indirect but visible pressure we all apply on each other to Keep It Civil Stupid. And by civil, I don't mean being respectful and avoiding troll-like behavior. I'm talking about the hypocrisy of political correctness. The constant fear of treading on someone's toes, of hurting someone's sensitivities.

We call ourselves the most open-minded people in the world, and yet we're no better than anyone else, and perhaps worse, because we're like the two-faced Janus - saying one thing aloud, but behaving in a way that completely contradicts our own declarations. We invite discussion, yet we tolerate no criticism. We get mortally offended by someone's even innocuous disagreement with our own point of view. From raising children, to struggles with personal health and reproductive issues, to politics, to just about any other topic widely covered out there, we say that we want to hear all points of views, yet in reality, we only want to hear people who agree with us, or who, at least, fall within a very narrow and limited "safe" range of critics we're ready to answer. No important differences there.

Our desire to make friends and please people, to gain and keep readers, to have nice, interesting discussions causes us to stiffle our voices in frustrations and find words or topics the majority of our targetted audience will approve.

If someone comes in and makes a very different value judgment from our own, it starts a flame war or at least a chain of sobbing posts across our microcommunities.

We gang up on each other, just like the very folk we hate to emulate.

We wanted the blogosphere to be a different, better world, but soon enough we wind up tearing off all masks, and however inadvertently, showing glimpses of our personalities even in the way we interact with our commenters. There's no hiding your real self in the blogosphere. You can hide your name, your habits, your interests, various details of your life. But you can never hide your own self - not in the blogosphere, not in the real world.

That's why, my dear Blogosphere, you're not some alternative reality, enacted by the choices of so many great, special individuals. You're merely a reflection of what real life is, albeit with distorted rules, new limitations, and perhaps, a little bit more of a salon-like atmosphere. You don't offer anything new. You don't offer new liberties. You only offer more opportunities to be yourself and to discover who you really are - and who are the people you choose to interact with.

The blogosphere, after all, is made up of real, breathing human beings, and just as any system, it only consists of what they make it to be. There's no reason to expect anything else.

Seeing through it all,
Irina

26 comments:

Shoshana said...

Really interesting perspective and great post. I do think that the blogosphere has give many the forum and opportunity to express opinions and thoughts that they don't otherwise feel comfortable doing, because the anonymity offers a safe haven for airing of non-popular ideas. But you are absolutely correct - who a person is can't be hidden and it does come out, whether a writer wants it to or not.

PsychoToddler said...

So true. What happened to the good old days when we were all anonymous and nasty?

evolver said...

Heh, confrontational but true. When I got accused of being a creepy stalker last year by a blogging group I'd never even knew was watching, I definitely retreated into my shell.

I didn't think I'd thought of all the stuff you've mentioned... but then I thought of all of it. And you're right, except in that I don't think I suffer any more about illusions about a "new found freedom."

I'm acutely aware I can't say whatever I want. :)

Irina Tsukerman said...

Shoshana: That's true; even if the freedom is only illusory, I still got a lot more comfotable writing, voicing issues, interacting with others, and meeting strangers than I would have with out it!

Psychotoddler: LOL, ah yes, the good old days! :)

Evolver: I was trying to be a bit provocative! ; ) Well, you're definitely not a stalker... : ) I wouldn't think of you as a criminal type! :D

marybishop said...

I'm still nasty and unPC...though I'll admit I've posted a shitload of cat pictures lately.

I'm Haaretz, Ph.D. said...

Excelent post irina- have you thought about the lack of information? Blog content used to be information based, not purely editorial. I also used to go from blog to blog, lurking and gathering fascinating tidbits and new ideas. Recently it's become many voices all pontificating about the exact same thing. BORING! Though I'm probably guilty of the same :)

Irina Tsukerman said...

MB: Good for you! But cat pictures are always a plus! :)

I'm Haaretz, ph.d: Excellent point... I think the blogosphere is facing a similar crisis of information gathering as MSM - for precisely the same reasons. But you've been blogging about some very interesting issues - I loved that post about the doll to prevent teenage pregnancy. Some classes in my high school had similar projects, and I found them annoying for the same reasons... except from your post, it seems that they've gone more hi-tech with it!

Amishav said...

Irina-
You're absolutely right about the blogosphere and its lost potential. But really, what is it that can be done? Mostly blogging is pure narcissism. I know that I'm a victim of that particular evil.

Irina Tsukerman said...

Amishav: Oh, there's absolutely nothing about narcissism... and I still think that blogosphere does have a lot of potential. But in order to realize it, we should adjust our approach and expectations, adjust to what actually is and what can and cannot be done.

Suburban Turmoil said...

I'm not sure how my post set you off, but you wrote a very good rant here.

I get a lot of e-mails now from people TELLING me what I should write about, which I find very annoying. I write about whatever's on my mind, period, and it's purely for my own enjoyment, although I appreciate the comment feedback. Usually. Sometimes my posts are a response to other things I'm reading online- More often they're based on what's going on in my real life.

I'm starting to hate having my real name on my blog though- Soooo many stories I can't tell now because EVERYONE (from my entire extended family to my friends from high school/college to my next door neighbors) is reading. Ugh.

Irina Tsukerman said...

ST: Maybe you can start a second, anonymous blog you can keep secret from your family, while telling all the "safe" stories on the main one! :)

jeremayakovka said...

Disagree here. While the b-sphere may "plateau", I don't see it playing itself out anytime soon. Provided, however, that bloggers keep themselves fact-driven (and fact-checking).

New challenges include fighting off government regulation (there's a "fairness" bill afoot to make us register with the feds in order to blog) and how (not whether or not) to shape electoral campaigns (vide Amanda Marcotte-John Edwards).

Michelle Malkin is a prime example of someone who contributes professionally in both the blogosphere and the MSM. (Howard Kurtz recently featured her in a WaPo article; she guest-hosted The O'Reilly Factor last Friday.) She keeps the bar raised high in all these media.

Imho, the b-sphere is the free marketplace of ideas of this generation. Whether it continues to fly, or falls, depends on all of us.

jeremayakovka said...

(btw, I think I do a pretty good job on my blog at not being PC.)

Irina Tsukerman said...

JMK: LOL, I'm not accusing any of my regular reads of being un-PC! (There's a reason why I read them!) Furthermore, I'm not predicting the fall of blogosphere. I'm saying, however, that it's susceptible to the same problems we all face in real life. By the way, I haven't heard about that bill, but it sounds pretty awful. What exactly is the point of it?

jeremayakovka said...

I've heard Dennis Kucinich's name attached to it. How far it's gone in the House I do not know. (Just search "fairness internet Kucinich" for more info.)

Irina Tsukerman said...

JMK: Thanks for the info. Hopefully it won't get anywhere. : (

jeremayakovka said...

Related: Have you noticed Judith's (Kesher Talk) posts about The Media As A Theatre of War conference?

Irina Tsukerman said...

JMK: Not yet, but I'll definitely check it out!

Thomas Forsyth said...

Dennis Kucinich is a diseased Keebler elf and belongs in a mental asylum. He also proposed legislation to ban mind control rays :) He has also been endorsed by fairy tale characters, but he knew Shirley Macliane in a past life.

The Fairness Doctrine was a tyranical part of Emperor Franlin I's New Deal that was finally reversed in 1987, which led to the rise of talk raido.

Besides, any legislation proposing "fairness" sets off every falangism warning in my brain I can imagine.

Irina Tsukerman said...

Thomas: Ha! I'm curious to hear more about all that!

Passionate Life said...

Irina,

I think your post is completely right on! I don't feel the freedom to really speak my mind anymore and its frustrating sometimes. At the end of the day, ANY new form of communication will ultimately be a reflection of our REAL lives.

But I think the main benefit of blogs is meeting people (and reading their personal feelings and thoughts) we would otherwise never have met in REAL life. It makes us feel connected and "normal" to a certain degree to see our thoughts and feelings reflected in others.

Great post, thanks!

Irina Tsukerman said...

P-Life: That's true... Blogging has definitely made making connections much easier... you get a tiny bit of a preview before you actually meet the person, so you make somewhat more informed choices about your company than when you meet complete strangers. You can still misinterpret the information or form distorted preconceptions, but it certainly helps in terms of feeling prepared! : ) I just wish I knew of a way to go back to the more innocent blogging days, when we all felt so much easier about writing whatever we felt like!

Anonymous said...

Malkin is not a good example - saying things that are politically useful is not the same as telling the truth. Her recent ruse about a fictious cop in Baghdad was trasparent from day one, even for people who share her politics.

Irina Tsukerman said...

Anonymous: Politically useful things can often be true, and truth can frequently be politically useful.

muse said...

I try not to take it all so seriously. It's my pretend journalism career.
The really frightening thing is the law suit against orthomom because of a comment. Google has thrown it all on her.

Irina Tsukerman said...

Muse: Yes, the key is not to get obsessed about it. I'm pretty surprised by Google's position in the matter... and will follow the matter closely. However, personally, I don't think the issue will get very far legally.